<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dear Obama Generation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dearobamageneration.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dearobamageneration.com</link>
	<description>Progressive politics, values, and perspectives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:24:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sacrilege at Ground Zero? Nope.</title>
		<link>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/sacrilege-at-ground-zero-nope/</link>
		<comments>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/sacrilege-at-ground-zero-nope/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradjshannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground zero mosque]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearobamageneration.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charles Krauthammer &#8211; Sacrilege at Ground Zero. In the article linked above, the &#8216;ground zero mosque&#8217; is compared to&#8230; a Disney theme park next to Manasass battlefield a viewing tower next to Gettysburg a convent at Auschwitz &#8230;but it is not much like any of these. The proposed location is not vacant. This is not about saving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/12/AR2010081204996.html">Charles Krauthammer &#8211; Sacrilege at Ground Zero</a>.</p>
<p>In the article linked above, the &#8216;ground zero mosque&#8217; is compared to&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>a Disney theme park next to Manasass battlefield</li>
<li>a viewing tower next to Gettysburg</li>
<li>a convent at Auschwitz</li>
</ul>
<p>&#8230;but it is not much like any of these. The proposed location is not vacant. This is not about saving a spacious, open sanctuary from desecration. This is not about the perversion of a spot with great historical significance. That place is down the street. This is about replacing a Burlington Coat Factory with a cultural center.</p>
<p>This is about private property and religious freedom, not some kind of Us versus Them crusade.</p>
<p><em>(BCF src: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/11/stewart-takes-on-ground-z_n_678224.html)</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/sacrilege-at-ground-zero-nope/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich Points Finger at Unemployed</title>
		<link>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/gingrich-points-finger-at-unemployed/</link>
		<comments>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/gingrich-points-finger-at-unemployed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradjshannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zimbardo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearobamageneration.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a good interesting quote from Newt: &#8220;The depth and length of this recession is at risk of creating a permanent pool of unemployed Americans, who get so used to being unproductive that they are willing to accept welfare indefinitely instead of taking a job.&#8221; This is called the Fundamental Attributional Error, in which individuals are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a <del>good</del> interesting quote from Newt:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The depth and length of this recession is at risk of creating a permanent pool of unemployed Americans, who get so used to being unproductive that they are willing to accept welfare indefinitely instead of taking a job.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>This is called the <strong>Fundamental Attributional Error</strong>, in which individuals are seen as responsible (due to their personal failings, e.g. &#8216;lack of discipline&#8217;) for a situational or systemic problem.</p>
<p>Conservatives frequently blame individuals as a way of minimizing problems at hand, or to misdirect. The problem isn&#8217;t that the unemployed have sub-par dispositions. It&#8217;s that they&#8217;re unemployed. See the misdirection? It hides the fact that Newt Gingrich has a sub-par disposition.</p>
<p>via <a href="http://crooksandliars.com/karoli/keith-olbermann-exposes-newt-gingrich-true">Keith Olbermann exposes Newt Gingrich as the true welfare queen | Crooks and Liars</a>.</p>
<p>(see Zimbardo&#8217;s <em>The Lucifer Effect</em> for more on dispositional vs situational vs systemic causation)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/gingrich-points-finger-at-unemployed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Re: CNN’s “Ground Zero Mosque” Poll</title>
		<link>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/re-cnns-ground-zero-mosque-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/re-cnns-ground-zero-mosque-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradjshannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground zero mosque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methodology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearobamageneration.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PDF of the poll Question 41 reads: &#8220;As you may know, a group of Muslims in the U.S. plan to build a mosque two blocks from the site in New York City where the World Trade Center used to stand. Do you favor or oppose this plan?&#8221; Well, that&#8217;s one way to frame it. People [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/images/08/11/rel11a.pdf">PDF of the poll</a></p>
<p>Question 41 reads:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;As you may know, a group of Muslims in the U.S. plan to build a mosque two blocks from the site in New York City where the World Trade Center used to stand. Do you favor or oppose this plan?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Well, that&#8217;s one way to frame it. People who don&#8217;t know about the issue will hear the question and many will react with a negative attitude toward the plan as described.</p>
<p><!-- commented out b/c irrelevant Regarding the issue's merits, there are at least two concerns that jump out: Fails to mention the property is lawfully owned by this group and they can do what they damn well please. Fails to mention their plan has the overwhelming approval of Manhattan's actual residents [source: poll mentioned on npr, find]. --></p>
<p>For a case like this I think favor/oppose is a tricky approach to use in writing poll questions. And CNN&#8217;s doing it in a way that <strong> favors </strong>the &#8220;oppose&#8221; response. Maybe I&#8217;m crazy, but I bet a lot of people hear the phrase, &#8220;a group of Muslims in the U.S. plan to&#8230;&#8221; and think of terrorism. Negative emotions, immediate opposition.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s consider a different framing. How about a yes/no?</p>
<p><em>&#8220;Should a group be allowed to build a mosque on their property if it would be located two blocks from where the World Trade Center used to stand in New York City?&#8221;</em></p>
<p>It may be positively loaded with &#8220;on their property&#8221; but it&#8217;s better than unnecessarily evoking subconscious fear in people and then trying to measure their opinion. Increased fear correlates to an increased conservative response. Lots of research backs this up. If you make people think about scary things and then ask them a question, they&#8217;ll give you a more conservative answer than if you made them think about something neutral. It&#8217;s certainly easier to give a &#8220;yes&#8221; response to the above than a &#8220;favor&#8221; response to CNN&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/re-cnns-ground-zero-mosque-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The “Ground Zero Mosque”</title>
		<link>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/the-ground-zero-mosque-2/</link>
		<comments>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/the-ground-zero-mosque-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 03:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Firko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground zero mosque]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearobamageneration.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An upsetting proportion of non-Muslim Americans excluded Muslim Americans from their communities after the attacks of September the 11th. To suggest that any great number of these excluded citizens had ties to, or sympathies for, any terrorist organization is absurd. Yet these Americans were excluded, even treated as un-American. I agree that building a mosque [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p style="padding-left: 30px"><em>An upsetting proportion of non-Muslim Americans excluded Muslim Americans from their communities after the attacks of September the 11th. To suggest that any great number of these excluded citizens had ties to, or sympathies for, any terrorist organization is absurd. Yet these Americans were excluded, even treated as un-American.</em></p>
<p>I agree that building a mosque 600 feet from ground zero seems (and in many ways is) an act of &#8216;stunning insensitivity,&#8217; as I have seen written on public forums. But I can’t help but notice another: that one of the most (allegedly) progressive democracies in the world ostracized a major world religion and all visible members of that religion because of the actions of a few violent radicals. That each of the religion’s practitioners, even those born and raised in the United States, even those with a love and pride for their American citizenship, were treated as outsiders, miscreants, and agents of evil; that their spaces and artifacts were treated as hostile forces. That we took from these, our fellow Americans, their nationality, saying that it was no longer theirs to have because some men who read the same book as them did an evil thing; probably not considering the shame many of them must have felt for being associated with such a horrible act. And, most importantly, that “we” felt compelled to unite against “them,” forgetting that “them” was in fact a tiny sect of the second-largest religion in the world, and that “we” includes literally millions of Muslim Americans. In the past century, did “we” unite against “them” when the Protestant-identifying Ku Klux Klan killed scores of African-Americans, Catholics, and Jews? We did not; we remembered that “we” and “them” are not such clearly delineated categories; that the Ku Klux Klan was just a tiny and distorted corner of Protestantism, an otherwise benevolent religion.</p>
<p>The blows that many Muslim Americans suffered after 9/11 were delivered by a hand both irrational and unjust. And, after nearly nine years of (much-deserved) sympathy for all other afflicted parties, where is the sympathy for them, the unfortunate scapegoats for all of our anger, the whipping-boy of American justice? Who shall clean their wounds?</p>
<p>Mayor Bloomberg says it well: “Let us not forget that Muslims were among those murdered on 9/11 and that our Muslim neighbors grieved with us as New Yorkers and as Americans. We would betray our values and play into our enemies’ hands if we were to treat Muslims different than anyone else.”</p>
<p>I think that this mosque (which is in fact a community center containing a mosque) may provide not only some of that cleansing and sympathy mentioned above, but do so in such a way that we might look to a future of coexistence with the Islamic world, which is becoming more a part of ours every day, rather than look back with anger on a tragic and painful wound. And we must learn to coexist, or we will be locked in a futile and stagnant conflict, the only result of which will be more lives lost, more families bereaved, more tragic days like September the 11th to remember.</p>
<p>Remember that the United States has been at many times divided in two. And Europe has seen itself cut into more cruel jigsaw puzzles than we care to remember. It was only after these places allowed the marriage of different ways of thinking and being, that they stopped senselessly ending lives. This mosque, I believe, is an opportunity to utter the first vow.</p>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dearobamageneration.com/2010/08/the-ground-zero-mosque-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who do we think we are?</title>
		<link>http://dearobamageneration.com/2009/06/who-do-we-think-we-are/</link>
		<comments>http://dearobamageneration.com/2009/06/who-do-we-think-we-are/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradjshannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Letters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearobamageneration.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://prezi.com/115374/view" height="451" width="600" border="0"></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dearobamageneration.com/2009/06/who-do-we-think-we-are/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Premise</title>
		<link>http://dearobamageneration.com/2009/06/premise/</link>
		<comments>http://dearobamageneration.com/2009/06/premise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradjshannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearobamageneration.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an outline in progress. Give it a second to load, then use your mouse wheel to zoom in and out: http://prezi.com/110954/view/ My first letter will probably be about reason as defined during the Enlightenment, the Rational Action theories of behavior that grew out of it, why they are fundamentally wrong, and how they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an outline in progress. Give it a second to load, then use your mouse wheel to zoom in and out:</p>
<p><a href="http://prezi.com/110954/view/">http://prezi.com/110954/view/</a></p>
<p>My first letter will probably be about reason as defined during the Enlightenment, the Rational Action theories of behavior that grew out of it, why they are fundamentally wrong, and how they affect society today.</p>
<p><em>References: <a href="http://www.linguistics.berkeley.edu/people/person_detail.php?person=21">George Lakoff</a> and <a href="http://people.virginia.edu/~jdh6n/">Jonathan Haidt</a> in the outline.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dearobamageneration.com/2009/06/premise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Launch!</title>
		<link>http://dearobamageneration.com/2009/06/launch/</link>
		<comments>http://dearobamageneration.com/2009/06/launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bradjshannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Site News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dearobamageneration.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Obama Generation, This blog will contain a series of letters about the politics, values, and perspectives that will shape tomorrow&#8217;s Progressive movement. I know a lot of you don&#8217;t care about politics. I understand. Just give me a chance. Thanks, -brad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Obama Generation,</p>
<p>This blog will contain a series of letters about the politics, values, and perspectives that will shape tomorrow&#8217;s Progressive movement. I know a lot of you don&#8217;t care about politics. I understand. Just give me a chance.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>-brad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dearobamageneration.com/2009/06/launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
